Annotations cc: Mathilde Hiley

Annotations cc: Mathilde Hiley

von Anoe Melliou

Mathilde Hiley captures objects mid-thought, suspended in a play of function and fiction. In this conversation, design meets the intimacy of still life through photography, a medium of translation, or rather, an association that shapes collective interpretation. A shared curiosity pulls us into the currents of creative industries, where disciplines converge and reassemble into new forms of spatial and visual language. I repeat — errors within a disciplined practice have a way of forging the iconic.

 

Anoe: Is an image ever inert in your mind before you capture it?

Mathilde: Always. I begin with a vision and chase it until I get as close as possible. But reality never exactly aligns with what’s in my mind; there’s always a tension between the imagined and the real.


A: That reminds me of design as a process, where you begin with an idea, but every step toward realization demands recalibration. The concept must capture the essence, yet the transition is never flawless. In my experience, it requires a flow and stages of research, not just practically, but conceptually.

M: Photography is my way of engaging with design. The story begins with the object, and in response, I look for inspiration, a word, a metaphor. Recently, I photographed a table that at first glance resembled a car wash mechanism. So, I researched car wash references, and studied technical details. I love working that way because, with each project, I discover something new. That process helps me frame the object in a new way since after all, it’s never just about the object itself.

A: Considering the designer’s vision, the object’s design, your own associations, and the photographic process, how do you navigate the phases of your practice?

M: I appreciate the trust the designers usually give me with their pieces. It allows me to avoid lighting the object purely in a commercial way. Instead of striving for perfection, I focus on creating an atmosphere, letting the object naturally exist within it.



A: I relate to the designer's feeling of being so immersed in a project that seeing it in a novel context can be difficult. When a photographer brings a personal perspective, it’s a gift — revealing the work from a viewpoint that hasn’t been considered. What aspects of your identity manifest in your photography?

M: I think my love for painting comes through. I look for texture in my work, almost as if I were painting. Every image feels personal — it’s like giving something of myself to the project. In the studio, I need to control every aspect. I plan everything: the lighting, the backdrop, the setup. After that, I spend hours playing with the images. The editing process might be my favorite part: refining the details, painting with the brush tool, adjusting colors. This phase is an experimental process. It feels like being in a laboratory.



A: Creative fields converge. In photography, I sense a spatial awareness, much like in architecture. There’s more than just a two-dimensional image. How did that style develop for you?

M: I treat objects as beings. I assisted many fashion photographers and was deeply inspired by their approach and use of light. When I photograph objects, I still think of them as models. I see the object as a portrait. I try to bring objects to life within the space they occupy, making them feel present and animated.

A: Fashion emphasizes design over the individual by using styling and composition to direct attention to the garments rather than the model.

M: Exactly. In still life, I use techniques from fashion lighting because it’s sharp and precise. Since the model moves, the light has to illuminate the entire set in a very specific way.



A: You are able to capture presence. Your work is not about revealing every detail. There is a strong sense of atmosphere around the object, making the image unforgettable. How does that come through?

M: I see furniture as a work of art. I love elevating pieces; it's an instinctive game for me. I achieve this by using unconventional angles not typically seen in still life and by embracing imperfect lighting that adds depth and character. I used to chase perfection, but now I welcome mistakes. The photos I love most often come from errors, that bring a rawness and authenticity that perfection never could.

A: Breaking the rules — sometimes that’s what leads to something iconic.

__

Text: Anoe Melliou
Photography by Mathilde Hiley

Explore Latest

  1. Weiterlesen: The Raw Beauty of Piedmont’s Brutalism
    The Raw Beauty of Piedmont’s Brutalism

    The Raw Beauty of Piedmont’s Brutalism

    Brutalism in Italy emerged in the post-war decades as both a radical response to reconstruction needs and an aesthetic rebellion against the softne...
    Weiterlesen
  2. Weiterlesen: The Human Vision of Louis Poulsen
    The Human Vision of Louis Poulsen

    The Human Vision of Louis Poulsen

    Light is one of the quietest yet most influential elements in our lives. It shapes the spaces we inhabit, sets our mood, and regulates our daily rh...
    Weiterlesen
  3. Weiterlesen: 48 Hours at 10AM Penthouse: Fragment of an Experience
    48 Hours at 10AM Penthouse: Fragment of an Experience

    48 Hours at 10AM Penthouse: Fragment of an Experience

    The night is distinct in its stormy insistence. The glass partitions before the bathtub are retracted. Immersed in the water, I observe the interva...
    Weiterlesen
  4. Weiterlesen: The Ideology of Made in Italy: In Conversation with Marco Ripa
    The Ideology of Made in Italy:  In Conversation with Marco Ripa

    The Ideology of Made in Italy: In Conversation with Marco Ripa

    Made in Italy was not always an emblem of pride; it was originally a regulatory clause. An outsider label to indicate product of foreign origin, it...
    Weiterlesen